The patent teaches “a method for producing graphical images includes executing a computer program and providing a shape library external to the computer program ․ he shape library defines a shape having associated capabilities.” Id. Micrografx owns the '633 patent, which is directed towards a method and system of generating graphical images for use in a computer program. Because we find that any error in the Board's claim construction is harmless, and substantial evidence supports the Board's findings of anticipation, we affirm. Micrografx also appeals the Board's denial of Micrografx's motion for leave to amend. The Board held that claims 1–4, 6, 8–11, 13, and 15 of U.S. Micrografx, LLC (“Micrografx”) appeals a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). SNYDER MISHIMA ALAM, Washington, DC SUSAN ROEDER, Menlo Park, CA MICHAEL TIMOTHY HAWKINS, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN. ALMELING, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellees. Also represented by ROBERT ALLAN BULLWINKEL, MICHAEL F. WILSON, Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellees 2015-2090 Decided: November 29, 2016īefore NEWMAN, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.ĭOUGLAS R. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |